I never read the book Catch-22, but I thought the film was fantastic and can’t understand why Altman’s M*A*S*H was so much more successful despite being decidedly inferior in every way. I guess it has more nudity, which must have counted for more back then.
I never read the book Catch-22, but I thought the film was fantastic and can’t understand why Altman’s M*A*S*H was so much more successful despite being decidedly inferior in every way. I guess it has more nudity, which must have counted for more back then.