Film Appreciation, by Scott Nye

You may also like...

6 Responses

  1. Chuck Degutis says:

    This feels “most fully” rushed. Or maybe written with deliberate childlike exuberance?

  2. Scott Nye says:

    Well, in this game you can’t always take the time you’d like to consider and refine each piece, so sorry if this one didn’t float your boat. I still stand by it, as I think it communicates my exuberance, child-like or otherwise. I do hope those who feel differently won’t take my jabs personally, however, because that’s just silly.

  3. Chuck Degutis says:

    It’s just that your exuberance tells me more about you than it does about the film.

  4. Chuck Degutis says:

    Your particular brand of soapbox exuberance, to clarify.

  5. Scott Nye says:

    Duly noted, but criticism would be nowhere without someone (the Cahiers crowd in the 1950s, the Reverse Shot crowd now (though I know I’m nowhere near as talented as either)) taking the soapbox for important causes that were being overlooked, misconstrued, or outright ignored.

    While we’re wildly off the subject, do you have any thoughts about the actual film?

  6. Franco says:

    Exuberance well justified! Scorsese’s best since Goodfellas.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.